Shetland fishermen’s concerns over sustainability approach
Shetland Fishermen’s Association has raised concerns over methodologies for assessing sustainability. Image: Shetland Fishermen

Shetland fishermen’s concerns over sustainability approach

Serious doubts have been raised about the way systems for the sustainability of fish stocks is assessed.

According to an expert paper produced by the Shetland Fishermen’s Association, arbitrary targets for maximum sustainable yield (MSY) are a political commitment rather than a biological or management necessity.

It points out that although setting fishing quotas in line with MSY is an internationally agreed commitment, it is a concept that in practice is extremely difficult that quantify and the result can be counterproductive management decisions.

MSY is based on the concept that there is a maximum amount of fish in any given stock that can be fished without depleting the overall size of the stock from year to year.

However, the paper argues that this does not reflect the complexity, variability and uncertainty of the real world.
It states that the so-called ‘MSY-approach’ to fisheries management is not based on the knowledge of the maximum sustainable yields from fish stocks, but rather on various proxies. Most of these in turn are based in turn on historic levels of abundance. The political commitment to MSY takes no account of the difficulties of achieving MSY in practice. Instead, it has resulted in unrealistic targets and unrealistic timescales.

The paper points out that the swingeing cut to the North Sea cod quota for 2020 was a political requirement to meet an arbitrary target based on what the cod stock was in 1996.

According the paper produced by the Shetland Fishermen’s Association, it is in realistic terms not possible to identify the actual maximum sustainable yield of a fish stock since we lack a sufficiently detailed understanding of the relationships between the size of fish stocks and their recruitment and growth, as well as density-depending factors such as competition and predation that affect their production.

It concludes that in the real world fish stocks are affected by a multiplicity of environmental factors which affect their recruitment, growth and survival.

Consequently, the production of fish stocks varies from year to year (and over other timescales): what may be sustainable in one year may not be sustainable in another.

The paper in full is available here.